Carson City, Nevada— Gov. Joseph Lombardo wants to help create MLB’s smallest ballpark, believing that the poorest team in baseball can bolster Las Vegas’s sports destination status.
The Oakland Athletics ballpark proposal rekindled debate regarding public funding for private sports organisations. Nevada’s powerful tourism industry, including trade unions, faces a growing chorus of primarily progressive groups nationwide concerned about using tax dollars to support sports stadiums instead of government services or schools.
Relocating the team from California to Nevada is a national debate. Buffalo, Atlanta, and Nashville sports teams received huge taxpayer subsidies from politicians. But Tempe voters rejected a $2.3 billion proposal for a new Arizona Coyotes facility.
The Oakland A’s organisation has hired more than a dozen lobbyists to convince lawmakers in Nevada’s normally sleepy, 60,000-resident state capital to approve the $1.5 billion stadium project, which will create jobs, boost economic activity, and add a new draw to Las Vegas’ tourism-based economy without raising taxes.
The city’s sudden sports success with NFL, NHL, and WNBA clubs that weren’t there seven years ago is the pitch.
“Las Vegas is certainly a sports town, and Major League Baseball should be a part of it,” Republican Lombardo said.
Tax credits and other public subsidies for professional sports clubs have been criticised. They cite accumulating evidence that the new stadium’s revenue would not be spent at surrounding resorts and eateries.
The state may receive less tax credits. After stadium costs, the A’s community involvement, including homelessness prevention and outreach, depends on money left over.
“I just cannot rationalise providing millions of taxpayer funds to a multibillion dollar corporation while we cannot pay for the essential services that our residents need,” Democratic Assemblywoman Selena La Rue Hatch said.
With two weeks left in the legislative session, Lombardo introduced the stadium finance bill last month.
The plan would provide up to $380 million in public aid, including $180 million in transferable tax credits and $120 million in taxpayer-backed county bonds, to finance stadium projects and a special tax district. Backers say the district will generate enough money to pay off bonds and interest.
Clark County, which covers Las Vegas, would give the A’s $25 million in infrastructure credit and waive property taxes for the publicly owned stadium.
Tax subsidies keep decades-old firms in Buffalo and Oakland, stadium proponents say. Nevada debates differently.
For years, policymakers and appointed committees have discussed diversifying the economy to justify subsidies to enterprises like Tesla. Legislators are considering a $190 million film tax credit system to attract large film studios to Las Vegas over 20 years.
The Legislature has until Monday, when the Legislature adjourns until 2025, to pass the stadium and film proposals, though a special session is possible.
Lawmakers are still debating both plans.
New stadium arrangements, usually publicly funded, have increased in recent decades. The Strip has two quite distinct examples.
A last-minute bill in Nevada’s 2016 special session allowed $750 million in hotel room taxes for the $2 billion Allegiant Stadium, home of the Las Vegas Raiders and the Super Bowl.
MGM Resorts and a California developer paid $375 million to build the Las Vegas Golden Knights T-Mobile Arena in 2016. The Stanley Cup began Saturday at the arena.
By allowing stadium workers to unionise, the A’s garnered support from the 60,000-member Las Vegas Strip Culinary Union. The state’s largest labour group, a crucial organising force for Democratic campaigns in the western swing state, endorsed him.
“We will support large-scale projects—whether they’re pro-teams, event centres or large companies—if they provide solid union jobs with healthcare and pensions,” said Ted Pappageorge, the Culinary Union’s secretary-treasurer.
Economists aren’t debating public finance for private sports stadiums, but governing bodies are.
A Stanford University economics emeritus professor, Roger Noll, said analysts argue whether new stadiums in cities have a slightly negative or positive net impact without public help.
A Las Vegas stadium must attract many non-Vegas visitors to be successful. Noll noted that if stadiums are another asset in an existing structure, the most investment would be in nearby attractions like the Sunset Strip’s resorts and restaurants.
He said that player salaries, who typically don’t live in their team’s city, take up a lot of the club’s budget.
Economic gains are “tiny,” Noll remarked. “They’re not big enough to justify hundreds of millions of dollars.”
Stadium funding author Noll said his peers had “no credible contrary position.”
At a recent session, Jeremy Aguero, head of a group collaborating with the A’s, acknowledged the criticism but told lawmakers that Las Vegas’ tourism-driven market was different.
Aguero’s business predicted 53% of the stadium’s annual attendees would come from outside the city, and 30% of the expected 405,000 out-of-towners would only visit Las Vegas with stadium activities in a study paid by the A’s.
“They come and stay in our hotel rooms, dine in our restaurants, and shop in our stores,” Aguero told lawmakers. “It drives great value.”
The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative employs Stern. Report for America positions journalists in newsrooms. Stern tweets @gabestern326.
AP 2023. Rights reserved. This content cannot be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
